Getting Your New ATE Project’s Evaluation off to a Great Start
2017
New ATE project principal investigators (PIs): When you worked with your evaluator to develop an evaluation plan for your project proposal, you...
Getting Your New ATE Project’s Evaluation off to a Great Start
Communication Plan Checklist for ATE Principal Investigators and Evaluators
2017
This 2017 checklist highlights the decisions that need to made when developing a clear communication plan. The communication plan should be an agreement between the project’s principal investigator and the evaluator, and followed by members of their respective teams.
Sustaining Private Evaluation Practices: Overcoming Challenges by Collaborating within Our ATE Community of Practice
2017
My name is Ben Reid. I am the founder of Impact Allies, a private evaluation firm. The focus of this post is...
Using Mutual Interviewing to Gather Student Feedback
2017
It’s hard to do a focus group with 12 or more students! With so many people and so little time, you know...
Vlog: Resources to Help with Evaluation Planning for ATE Proposals
2017
Evaluation is an important element of an ATE proposals. EvaluATE has developed several resources to help you develop your evaluation plans and...
Not Just an Anecdote: Systematic Analysis of Qualitative Evaluation Data
2017
As a Ph.D. trained anthropologist, I spent many years learning how to shape individual stories and detailed observations into larger patterns that...
Reporting Anticipated, Questionable, and Unintended Project Outcomes
2017
Project evaluators are aware that evaluation aims to support learning and improvement. Through a series of planned interactions, event observations, and document...
Evaluation: All the Funded ATE Proposals Are Doing It
2017
This webinar will review the key elements of a winning evaluation plan and strategies for demonstrating to reviewers that evaluation is an integral part of your project, not an afterthought.
EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant numbers 0802245, 1204683, 1600992, and 1841783. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.