The Retrospective Pretest Method for Evaluating Training
2016
In a retrospective pretest,1 trainees rate themselves before and after a training in a single data collection event. It is useful for...
The Retrospective Pretest Method for Evaluating Training
Evaluating for Sustainability: How can Evaluators Help?
2016
Developing a functional strategy to sustain crucial program components is often overlooked by project staff implementing ATE-funded initiatives. At the same time,...
Project Data for Evaluation: Google Groups Project Team Feedback
2016
At Censeo Group, a program evaluation firm located in northeast Ohio, we are evaluating a number of STEM projects and often face...
Small Project Evaluation: Principles and Practices
2016
An effective small project evaluation requires a clear-cut and feasible project plan, an evaluation plan that matches the project’s scope and purpose,...
Good Communication Is Everything!
2016
I am new to the field of evaluation, and the most important thing that I learned in my first nine months is...
Needs Assessment: What is it and why use it?
2016
Hi! I am Mary Siegrist from IMSA, a research and evaluation company located in Colorado. I would like to talk about needs...
Logic Models and Evaluation Planning – Working Together!
2016
As an evaluator, I am often asked to work on evaluation plans for National Science Foundation proposals. I believe it is important...
Show Me a Story: Using Data Visualization to Communicate Evaluation Findings
2016
It’s all too easy for our evaluation reports to become a lifeless pile of numbers that gather dust on a shelf. As...
EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant numbers 0802245, 1204683, 1600992, and 1841783. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.