Showing 257-264 of 515 Results
Sort By

Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts: Identifying Your Project’s Achievements and Supporting Evidence
2015

Updated April 2019 for Throwback Thursday series. The deadline for proposals to the National Science Foundation’s Advanced Technological Education program for this...

Identifying Your NSF Project’s Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts Template
2015

This 2015 template is intended to help project leaders and evaluators identify evidence of intellectual merit and broader impacts within their project.

Checklists for Evaluating K-12 and Credentialing Testing Programs
2015

In 2012, we created two checklists for evaluators to use as a tool for evaluating K-12 and credentialing assessment programs. The purpose...

2 for 1: The Retrospective Pretest Method for Evaluating Training
2015

The retrospective pretest method for evaluating professional development activities requires participants to rate their knowledge and abilities before and after a training...

Evaluation Training and Professional Development
2015

Hello ATE Community! My name is Cheryl Endres, and I am the new blog editor and doctoral associate for EvaluATE. I am...

Shorten the Evaluation Learning Curve: Avoid These Common Pitfalls
2015

This EvaluATE newsletter issue is focused on getting started with evaluation. It’s oriented to new ATE principal investigators who are getting their...

Results from Prior NSF Support Checklist
2015

This 2015 checklist summarizes elements that one should include when writing results from prior NSF support in an NSF proposal.

Survey Says Fall 2015
2015

The ATE program supported nearly 1,300 programs at 2-year colleges and secondary schools across the country in 2014. The full report of...

Nation Science Foundation Logo EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant numbers 0802245, 1204683, 1600992, and 1841783. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.