Shorten the Evaluation Learning Curve: Avoid These Common Pitfalls*
2020
This EvaluATE blog is focused on getting started with evaluation. It’s oriented to new ATE principal investigators who are getting their projects...
Shorten the Evaluation Learning Curve: Avoid These Common Pitfalls*
Designing Accessible Digital Evaluation Materials
2020
* This blog was originally published on AEA365 on July 23, 2020: https://aea365.org/blog/designing-accessible-digital-evaluation-materials-by-don-glass/ Hi, I am Don Glass, a DC-based developmental evaluator,...
How to Avoid Common Pitfalls When Writing Evaluation Plans for ATE Proposals
2020
Join this webinar to learn what pitfalls to watch out for when writing evaluation plans for grant proposals! In this webinar, we...
10 Helpful Hints and 10 Fatal Flaws: Writing Better Evaluation Sections in Your Proposals
2020
This 2020 guide identified 10 helpful hints and 10 fatal flaws to apply when writing evaluation sections in your project proposals.
Collection of Quick Reference Guides
2019
This collection includes over 50 evaluation quick reference guides that address evaluation planning, to data collection, to reporting. Quick reference guides are practical reference or resource materials such as checklists, worksheets, templates, info-graphics, cheat sheets, or even a table or page in a book
Impact Evaluation: Why, What, and How
2019
This webinar is an introduction to impact evaluation and how it can be realistically implemented in ATE projects.
Evaluating Professional Development Projects*
2019
A good prompt to start thinking about how to approach the evaluation of an Advanced Technological Education (ATE) professional development (PD) project...
Kirkpatrick Model for ATE Evaluation
2019
The Kirkpatrick Model is an evaluation framework organized around four levels of impact: reaction, learning, behavior, and results. It was developed more...
EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant numbers 0802245, 1204683, 1600992, and 1841783. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.