Designing a Purposeful Mixed Methods Evaluation
2017
A mixed methods evaluation involves collecting, analyzing, and integrating data from both quantitative and qualitative sources. Sometimes, I find that while I...
Designing a Purposeful Mixed Methods Evaluation
Declutter Your Reports: The Checklist for Straightforward Evaluation Reports
2017
Evaluation reports have a reputation for being long, overly complicated, and impractical. The recent buzz about fresh starts and tidying up for...
Outcome Evaluation: Step-by-Step
2016
Learn how to identify appropriate outcomes to assess in an evaluation and how to use those intended outcomes as a foundation for planning or enhancing data collection, analysis, and interpretation.
Small-Scale Evaluation
2016
Webinar participants will learn the basics of small-scale evaluation, using a typical ATE small project as the case example.
The Value of Using a Psychosocial Framework to Evaluate STEM Outcomes Among Underrepresented Students
2016
Drs. Dawn X. Henderson, Breonte S. Guy, and Chad Markert serve as Co-Principal Investigators of an HBCU UP Targeted Infusion Project grant....
Three Tips for a Strong NSF Proposal Evaluation Plan
2016
I’m Leslie Goodyear and I’m an evaluator who also served as a program officer for three years at the National Science Foundation...
The Retrospective Pretest Method for Evaluating Training
2016
In a retrospective pretest,1 trainees rate themselves before and after a training in a single data collection event. It is useful for...
Evaluating for Sustainability: How can Evaluators Help?
2016
Developing a functional strategy to sustain crucial program components is often overlooked by project staff implementing ATE-funded initiatives. At the same time,...
EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant numbers 0802245, 1204683, 1600992, and 1841783. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.